Gale Force! RSS

A strong wind blows if your 14 year old sister had a blog before you did.

Archive

Oct
17th
Mon
permalink
I am non-party, married, with a 5-year-old son. I work as an engineer and have been and still am in a responsible position. I regard myself as a good citizen of the U.S.S.R.
I cannot agree with the prohibition of abortions. And I am very glad that this law has not entered into force but has been submitted to the workers for discussion.
The prohibition of abortion means the compulsory birth of a child to a woman who does not want a child. The birth of a child ties married people to each other. Not everyone will readily abandon a child, for alimony is not all that children need. Where the parents produce a child of their own free will, all is well. But where a child comes into the family against the will of the parents, a grim personal drama will be enacted which will undoubtedly lower the social value of the parents and leave its mark on the child.
A categorical prohibition of abortion will confront young people with a dilemma: either complete sexual abstinence or the risk of jeopardizing their studies and disrupting their life. To my mind any prohibition of abortion is bound to mutilate many a young life. Apart from this, re result of such a prohibition might be an increase in the death-rate from abortions because they will then be performed illegally….
— An editorial printed in Izvestiia in May 1936, months before abortions, legal since the revolution of 1917, were banned in the USSR. The wheel on these ethical debates keeps on getting reinvented.